Communication in Individual and Collectivist Societies Essay

How do people in individualist cultures behave other than to people in collectivist cultures? People in collectivist cultures to individually one person is encouraged to be an active hunter or authority in society, to function as a whole.The rights, as a whole, surmount those of the individual.Rules promote unity, and self slightness.Working with others is considered the norm.Community strength is their main focus.People in individualistic culturesThey promote the I for identity.Strive for goals, initiative, esteem and achievement.Independence is valued, less motive to help others.Not relying on others is viewed as a norm.Doing things on your own, depending only on ones self.As you were growing up, in what ways were you reared to be individualistic or collectivistic? Which orientation was the overriding cultural value of your family?For what I can remember, as a child, I was raised to be to a greater extent collectivistic but with a minute bit of individualistic as well. Growin g up with a large, lovingness and close family, it only came natural to me to fit into the collectivistic category. When you are girlish you are still learning therefor depend on others to invite knowledge and understanding to learn.One can only view themselves as collectivistic when it comes to being technical when viewing how you were raised. Also, I was involved in many friendship groups and multiple sports growing up. I had to learn from others how to play the sport, but once I grew in my skill of that sport, I then(prenominal) depended on myself to get better. So, both collectivistic and individualistic were used in upbringing. But as far as a predominant role, I would have to lean to collectivistic.Explain the connections between these two cultures with the dialectic approach. Which of the hexad dialectics is the most predominant in assistingpeople in communicating more effectively in intercultural interactions? Provide examples to support your response.In this article, t he two approaches that stood off to me were the cultural-individual and personal-contextual approaches. Seeing how there were several people in an argument from antithetic cultures doesnt surprise me there was conflict amongstthem. Plus the context-personal played into each person differently and how they responded. And because of that, each persons cultural cathode-ray oscilloscope came into play.