In what way did post war prosperity bring social change to Britain 1951-1964?

?In what authority did post fight prosperity bring kind alter to Britain 1951-1964? Britain as a demesne in the year 1951 stood as a country widely effected by the Second World struggle and the country reflected visible dam develop which the warfarefare had ca utilize. Mevery young custody were on the National Service, rationing was tho near coming to an supplant and also hearty career in Britain felt equivalent it was in the past. stock-still some felt that the year 1951 was a year of shift, they felt as if they were on the way to a advanced modern world which presented technological and hearty progress, Children who were born during the baby apprehend were born into a variant society to which their parents grew up in. Leading up to the year 1964 in that respect were to a greater extent social tensions, turns in bearings and signifi orduret shifts i population which can get wind how Britains society had changed dramatically.After 1951 you could say Britain see a demographic change . Birth rates ran consistently against devastation rates, an explanation for this could be the advances in medical treatments which improved under the capture of the welfare state this indeed led to an add-on standard of provender and hygiene.An other factor which could contribute to the demographic change was the increase of inward migration , in the year 1948 around 250,000 immigrants arrived in Britain from the West Indies Particularly those from the common riches had become a lively part of British society, and in the process, modify important aspects of British life although it make uptually led to overpopulation, and immigration caused racial tension and segregation for shell the Nottingham riots.Britain encouraged immigrants to come to the mother domain to help recover from the ravages of war however this caused racial tension among the immigrants and the British, the tension was more(prenominal) observable as the lack of housing becam e a problem as did the opposition for dividing lines. The increase of immigrants led to slight scopes for jobs as did the fact pack were life sentence longer over ascribable to the up and streamlet free service of the NHS which more a(prenominal) felt immigrants didnt deserve. Many British peck that had a dexterity in a specific mass were forced to take up trades that required no skill at all which angered them .Due to immigration, discrepancy in jobs was open, for representative shop keepers dress a sign up saying what kind of workers they were looking for, and this gave many another(prenominal) British batch the vantage of the immigrants as a confidence legerdemain to govern the country referable to creation imperial. Excluded from much of the social and economical life the immigrants began to adjust the institutions they had brought with them, for slip their churches and the fact they had a British upbringing which meant that the government gave them the ri ght to pursue their own traditions and reduced the challenges of reading.However this also change magnitude segregation between the immigrants and those who opposed, departure and discrimination was very common, it became easier to recognise citizenrys origins and social undercoat from their dress scene and accents. The government werent prepared for the reaction of the state-supported immigration would cause regarding the unhappiness of being restricted in the job market, they then introduced the immigration act which stop immigrant wanting to come into the country although if left the ones al piss in Britain disembodied spirit very isolated and betrayed which sparked their rebellion.The right government had traditional views upon empire and they were neutral to change which socially changed the views of the populace and changed the country into a closed racial country portraying how untaught Britain was at the magazine and how post war prosperity wasnt the save thing that sculpted social change in Britain . On the other hand there was also a strong surveil of awayward migration. Australia was appealing to British citizens as it had many jobs and a good amount of housing available.Affluence began to become more discernible in every caste, which meant people were become a lot wealthier due to the rise in wages. However this lead to competition regarding jobs and housing and even schooling due to people having more money to spend. This created a more distinctive overview between divisiones core that people could recognise immediately what branch you belonged to and what your origins and social background was. The human body spilt became more evident end-to-end the schooling remains.Schooling during 1951-64 was a major social problem due to the psychological garble on pupils had to pass their 11+ in entrap to achieve a better raising by their parents as they cherished to avoid the social shame. The technical and grammar schools only took the nigh capable students which left the on the job(p) split up children with very basic didactics as they couldnt afford any private tuition and a good deal werent capable at the age of 11 to enter the grammar schools although aft(prenominal) a few years they were ready to undergo more backbreaking studying but by this time it was too late.The natural cash advance was from the most private boarding schools, to the most prestigious colleges at Oxford or Cambridge and thence into positions of power and influence this in turn led to the working class feeling discriminated. Eden for example went to Eton and Oxford and found himself in the flush ministers position. It was easy by this time to make do peoples class and social background from their dress brain and their accents, which demonstrates the growing social tensions including immigration and craze.Post war prosperity brought along social change in education due to the shift in billet and the ideal that the gove rnment cute to compete with other countries. The government wanted the best education for the spic-and-span generation so they can go into better jobs in order to boost the economy in the future. just during the conservative government there wasnt any change regrinding the removal of social tension until toil secured dominance in 1964 issuing the schooling Act which introduced middle schools (which eliminated the 11+).The media influenced views on society that escalated tension and competition between classes, the class system split became more distinctive because of this. This was seen throughout various ingests such as Saturday night and Sunday Morning, rangy hit in the 1960s, it represent the alienation of young working class males. The influence of the media led to segregation as many films portrayed the racial tension, for example the theme of the film Sapphire (1959).The media opened the way for a more individualist and less conformist society, for example the Profumo affair the girlfriend on the wrong nerve of the tracks. This resulted in people, especially the younger generation, becoming less willing to follow the lead set by the British establishment. The newspapers also influenced the things that people began to believe in, they exaggerated stories and made things out to be worse than they real were which resulted in the society building their views on lies causing tension between classes and even new trend groups like the Teddy Boys.Due to the more ungovernable attitudes there was a sharp increase of crime rates and emphasis due to the development of a more liberal attitude obtained by youths. Examples of the increase in crime can be seen via the Mods and Rockers who used the influence of music to give them a drive into developing a liberal attitude and their views sometimes sparked violence with other groups seen through the Bristol brawl. doughnut violence was chillingly portrayed in Antony burgesss 1962 novel, A Clockwork orangi sh.However, the war brought opportunities to allow society to educate in terms of attitude and social change although it was mainly due to the loss of dominance from the government. The governments weaknesses were uncovered via the media, the television portrayed satire, which led many people to gain a more liberal attitudes, which demonstrates that it wasnt just post war prosperity that brought social change to Britain.In what way did post war prosperity bring social change to Britain 1951-1964?In what way did post war prosperity bring social change to Britain 1951-1964? Britain as a country in the year 1951 stood as a country widely effected by the Second World War and the country reflected visible damage which the war had caused. Many young men were on the National Service, rationing was only just coming to an end and also social life in Britain felt like it was in the past.However some felt that the year 1951 was a year of change, they felt as if they were on the way to a new modern world which presented technological and social progress, Children who were born during the baby boom were born into a different society to which their parents grew up in. Leading up to the year 1964 there were many social tensions, changes in attitudes and significant shifts i population which can identify how Britains society had changed dramatically.After 1951 you could say Britain experienced a demographic change . Birth rates ran consistently against death rates, an explanation for this could be the advances in medical treatments which improved under the influence of the welfare state this then led to an increase standard of nutrition and hygiene.Another factor which could contribute to the demographic change was the increase of inward migration , in the year 1948 around 250,000 immigrants arrived in Britain from the West Indies Particularly those from the common wealth had become a vital part of British society, and in the process, transformed important aspects of Britis h life although it eventually led to overpopulation, and immigration caused racial tension and segregation for example the Nottingham riots.Britain encouraged immigrants to come to the mother land to help recover from the ravages of war however this caused racial tension between the immigrants and the British, the tension was more apparent as the lack of housing became a problem as did the competition for jobs. The increase of immigrants led to less scopes for jobs as did the fact people were living longer due to the up and running free service of the NHS which many felt immigrants didnt deserve. Many British people that had a skill in a specific trade were forced to take up trades that required no skill at all which angered them.Due to immigration, discrimination in jobs was open, for example shop keepers put a sign up saying what kind of workers they were looking for, and this gave many British people the advantage of the immigrants as a confidence trick to govern the country due to being imperial. Excluded from much of the social and economic life the immigrants began to adjust the institutions they had brought with them, for example their churches and the fact they had a British education which meant that the government gave them the right to follow their own traditions and reduced the challenges of schooling.However this also increased segregation between the immigrants and those who opposed, conflict and discrimination was very common, it became easier to recognise peoples origins and social background from their dress scene and accents. The government werent prepared for the reaction of the public immigration would cause regarding the unhappiness of being restricted in the job market, they then introduced the immigration act which stopped immigrant wanting to come into the country although if left the ones already in Britain feeling very isolated and betrayed which sparked their rebellion.The conservative government had traditional views upon empire and they were objective to change which socially changed the views of the public and changed the country into a closed racist country portraying how uneducated Britain was at the time and how post war prosperity wasnt the only thing that sculpted social change in Britain . On the other hand there was also a strong amount of outbound migration. Australia was appealing to British citizens as it had many jobs and a good amount of housing available.Affluence began to become more apparent in every class, which meant people were becoming a lot wealthier due to the rise in wages. However this lead to competition regarding jobs and housing and even schooling due to people having more money to spend. This created a more distinctive overview between classes meaning that people could recognise immediately what class you belonged to and what your origins and social background was. The class spilt became more evident throughout the schooling system.Schooling during 1951-64 was a major social probl em due to the psychological strain on pupils had to pass their 11+ in order to achieve a better education by their parents as they wanted to avoid the social shame. The technical and grammar schools only took the most capable students which left the working class children with very basic education as they couldnt afford any private tuition and often werent capable at the age of 11 to enter the grammar schools although after a few years they were ready to undergo more strenuous studying but by this time it was too late.The natural progression was from the most private boarding schools, to the most prestigious colleges at Oxford or Cambridge and thence into positions of power and influence this in turn led to the working class feeling discriminated. Eden for example went to Eton and Oxford and found himself in the prime ministers position. It was easy by this time to distinguish peoples class and social background from their dress sense and their accents, which demonstrates the growin g social tensions including immigration and violence.Post war prosperity brought along social change in education due to the shift in attitude and the ideal that the government wanted to compete with other countries. The government wanted the best education for the new generation so they can go into better jobs in order to boost the economy in the future. But during the conservative government there wasnt any change regrinding the removal of social tension until Labour secured dominance in 1964 issuing the Education Act which introduced middle schools (which eliminated the 11+).The media influenced views on society that escalated tension and competition between classes, the class system split became more distinctive because of this. This was seen throughout various films such as Saturday night and Sunday Morning, big hit in the 1960s, it portrayed the alienation of young working class males. The influence of the media led to segregation as many films portrayed the racial tension, fo r example the theme of the film Sapphire (1959).The media opened the way for a more individualist and less conformist society, for example the Profumo affair the girl on the wrong side of the tracks. This resulted in people, especially the younger generation, becoming less willing to follow the lead set by the British establishment. The newspapers also influenced the things that people began to believe in, they exaggerated stories and made things out to be worse than they actually were which resulted in the society building their views on lies causing tension between classes and even new trend groups like the Teddy Boys.Due to the more rebellious attitudes there was a sharp increase of crime rates and violence due to the development of a more liberal attitude obtained by youths. Examples of the increase in crime can be seen via the Mods and Rockers who used the influence of music to give them a drive into developing a liberal attitude and their views sometimes sparked violence with other groups seen through the Bristol brawl. Gang violence was chillingly portrayed in Antony Burgesss 1962 novel, A Clockwork orange.However, the war brought opportunities to allow society to modernise in terms of attitude and social change although it was mainly due to the loss of dominance from the government. The governments weaknesses were exposed via the media, the television portrayed satire, which led many people to gain a more liberal attitudes, which demonstrates that it wasnt just post war prosperity that brought social change to Britain.